| Autor |
|
|
|
| ommitted and the referee shoul |
|
|
| 1445 Beiträge - Hardcoreposter
|
|
|
Already with the lead in TSN.cas Heisman Watch, Johnny Football took advantage of Marcus Mariotas bye week out west to separate himself from the pack a little with a monster performance in Week 10, albeit against a weak opponent. Manziel accounted for six touchdowns (four throwing, two rushing) and 340 yards (273 through the air, 67 on the ground) in Texas A&Ms rout of the one-win UTEP Miners. Yes, the Aggies have two losses this year and so far have only won the games they were supposed to, but Manziels stat line – even with missing some time earlier this season – is too sterling to ignore at this time. Manziels Heisman defence will ultimately come down to the two week stretch when A&M faces LSU and Missouri back-to-back to close out November, but until then he should retain pole position for the coveted trophy. At Florida State, Jameis Winston remains in the contenders fray with a big ACC win over The U, but he blew his chance to hop Mariota and join Manziel in the Top 2 with a pedestrian game in the Seminoles blowout of the Hurricanes. Winston accounted for more than 350 yards but had just one of the teams five touchdowns while also throwing two interceptions against Miamis defence. Winstons next three weeks are against substandard opponents, giving him a chance to pad his stats and catch up to Manziel before a rivalry game against the Florida Gators to cap the Seminoles regular season which could have big implications on the redshirt freshmans chances. With a number of fringe candidates enjoying byes in Week 10, the Heisman Watch is as much of a three horse race as it has ever been. Theres still plenty of time for things to change but for now it would be surprising to hear a name other than Manziel, Mariota, or Winston called for the Heisman at the end of the season. Sam Mills Elite Jersey . -- The Los Angeles Galaxy have signed coach Bruce Arena to a multi-year contract extension. Sam Mills Jersey . - Golden State Warriors owner Joe Lacob says the team is pushing back plans to build an arena on the San Francisco waterfront at least one year. http://www.shopthepanthersonline.com/Elite-Luke-Kuechly-Pant hers-Jersey/ .com) - There was clearly no looking ahead for the U. Dwan Edwards Jersey . Sopoaga hit the upright with his first shot at goal from 15 metres. He then kicked nine goals in succession -- two conversions and seven penalties -- before being replaced in the 62nd minute, three points short of the Highlanders record for most points in a match. Antoine Cason Womens Jersey . -- Champ Bailey finally gets a chance to live up to his name.Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca. Hi Kerry, I am sure you will get a ton of emails on this one. Last night, the Kings went up 2-1 on the Sharks around eight minutes remaining. My question with this goal - Is Justin Williams allowed to hit the goalie with his stick? Cant this be considered goalie interference? I am a Ducks fan waiting to see my next opponent. I really think the Sharks were cheated here. The NHL says this type of play is non-reviewable. This excuse just seems like an easy way out from a judgment call. Thanks,Jake Kevari Jake: The L.A. Kings greasy second goal should have been disallowed by referee Chris Lee as per rule 69.6 when Justin Williams used his stick to push Alex Stalock, set in a statuesque pose, that resulted in both the puck and the toe of Stalocks left skate to cross the goal line into the net. It appeared that the referee was purely focused on the puck that became partially visible under the left skate of Alex Stalock after the goalie made the initial save. If referee Lee taken had taken into account the action of Justin Williams pushing Stalock from the front of the goal crease with his hockey stick or subsequently had the opportunity to utilize video review I would hope that a different decision on the play would have been rendered. Many fans who follow me on twitter @kfraserthecall (Kings Fans perhaps?) could not comprehend that the action of Justin Williams pushing Alex Stalock with his stick became a goalie interference violation. Language contained in Rule 69 defines contact, whether incidental or otherwise, to mean any contact that is made between or among a goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or any part of the body. Some had even more difficulty accepting that Rule 69.6 applied on this play since Stalock was not knocked completely into the back of the net. Rule 69.6 reads; "In the event that a goalkeeper has been pushed into the net together with the puck by an attacking player after making a stop, the goal will be disallowed." To simplify this play, Alex Stalock made an initial save on his knees wheen Robin Regehr shot the puck from the top left side faceoff circle.dddddddddddd Stalocks lower body remained stationary inside the top right side of his goal crease after the puck was gobbled up in his pads. Referee Chris Lee attacked the net straddling the goal line with the whistle in a ready position near his mouth demonstrating some intent to blow the whistle and kill the play; that is until he saw the puck peek out from under Stalocks left skate blade and pad. The refs body posture and head position indicates that he was intently focused on the puck from this moment forward. Freeze frame that visual picture in your mind for a second! If in this moment, Justin Williams dove or crashed into Alex Stalock resulting in the puck entering the net, I would think most everyone would agree that "goalie interference" had been committed and the referee should disallow the goal. The exact same illegal outcome was achieved when Justin Williams used his hockey stick to push Stalock within his goal crease and off his set-stationary position which caused both the puck and the goalies left skate to cross the goal line and enter the net as demonstrated by the overhead net-cam shot. To disallow the goal under Rule 69.6 would be purely academic at this point had the referee been focused more on the action taking place at the front of the net as opposed to the puck. Ideally, the whistle (or intent to blow the whistle) should have been exercised once Justin Williams began pushing Alex Stalock with his stick, if not before! Jake, video review can only be utilized in eight specific situations as listed in Rule 38.4. At the present time interference on the goalkeeper is not one of them. I have continually stated that referees must have the ability to review their initial decision whenever contact with the goalkeeper is in question. This should be initiated by the officials on the ice, the video goal judge or through a coachs challenge. However the review is initiated, I strongly recommend that a referee(s) makes the final call after personally reviewing the play in question on a monitor in the timekeepers box. Look for expanded use of video review in some form next season. We can only hope they get it right. ' ' '
|
| Beitrag vom 04.12.2014 - 05:01 |
|
| Beiträge
| Autor
| Datum
|
|
| gengm125 |
04.12.2014 - 05:01 |
