Status-
Besucher
| Heute: |
|
455 |
| Gestern: |
|
589 |
| Gesamt: |
|
15033889 |
-
Benutzer & Gäste
4930 Benutzer registriert, davon online: 86 Gäste
|
|
|
| 18575 Beiträge & 12638 Themen in 21 Foren |
Keine neuen Beiträge, seit Ihrem letzten Besuch am 25.04.2026 - 19:54.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Autor |
|
|
|
| /]Authentic Marcus Allen Jersey[/ |
|
|
| 851 Beiträge - Forenjunkie
|
|
|
Dr. Muhammad S. MegalommatisRefutation of Prof. Mark Juergensyer's article 'Is ISIS Islamic': In a previous article under title 'Ottoman Empire Authentic Kyle Orton Jersey , Fake 'Middle East', the Pseudo-Christians of the West, and the Forthing Tribulation', I analyzed why the Western Christians' stance towards their ernnts' policies against the Ottoman Empire and its dethed provinces (the technical entities of the so-called 'Middle East') is very wrong, definitely immoral, and in total contradiction with the Christian principles, values and virtues. I concluded that a great number of nominal Christians, who approved of the evil policies and deeds of the Western ernnts, are in reality pseudo-Christians irrespective of what they may think they are. In a world engulfed in the worst crisis of identity of all tis, it is only normal that doubts are raised as regards the identity of the 'other.' Only yesterday, Prof. Mark Juergensyer, who specializes in 'global religion' - a non-existent entity - questioned in an article the identity of ISIS (Is ISIS Islamic .theglobalist.is-isis-islamic). Quite interestingly Authentic Kraig Urbik Jersey , under the title, a motto gives the summarizing idea of the article ("Every religion has its dark sides, but the conflict is about politics."). This is absolutely irrelevant; dark sides in a religion are what you don't know of that religion. They don't exist by themselves. No religion has ever had any dark side whatsoever. And all conflicts about politics cannot be deprived of their own religious dinsion, because everything in a human society hinges on the spiritual belief or disbelief. Atheists are religious too; they are slaves of Satan either they understand it or not. Their theory and their rejection of God is a form of Satanic faith. When one starts with so many preconceived ideas as the global religion theoretician Prof. Mark Juergensyer, his approh is dood to fail, but this does not originate from the lk of knowledge of the 'other side'. And Prof. Mark Juergensyer's main problem is not his lk of insightful knowledge about both, the Islamic world and ISIS itself. The article reveals a serious problem of Christian identity and for this reason I intended to nt on it. I think that my nts will be useful to both, Christians and Muslims. The author of the article tries to implent the following simplistic logic: if we hold the Ku Klux Klan in the US and the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda as 'Christian', then we can consider ISIS as 'Islamic'. This sort of approh does not clarify anything, and rather creates further confusion among both, Christians and Muslims. Generally speaking, I understand and aept the approh through analogy Authentic Kiko Alonso Jersey , but to implent this thod in your text, you've got to select very firm examples. Yes, it is correct to say 'if we hold the New and the Old Testant as holy books for the Christians, then we can consider the Quran as holy book for Muslims'. Beyond the limit of such parisons, we can hieve minimal result through analogy and at tis lose clarity. There is always a very serious mistake in every approh that avoids a proper, direct definition and attempts to define sothing through its opposite. If you want to define Christianity, you cannot possibly be as vague as you are when saying 'Christianity is sothing other than different from Ku Klux Klan' (or the LRA). Ditto for the Islamic World. It is really gross to try to define Christianity as the antithesis of what the author calls the LRA 'a terrible terrorist organization'! Who can expect a religion to possibly be 'a terrible terrorist organization' No one! In addition, there are in Uganda hundreds of thousands if not millions of simple people who, if not terrorized, will have the courage to state that the LRA is NOT a terrorist organization - or if you want not as terrorist as the execrable, rist Ugandan ernnt. And who is authorized to speak about 'terrorism' The global mass dia Or the defenders of a non-existent 'global religion' But the term 'terrorism' (or 'terrorist') is an unhistorical fabrication that was posed only recently as a vicious tool of the world's most evil, most villainous Authentic Kevin Kolb Jersey , and most dictatorial regis, the likes of Arica, England and France. It has no credibility, and above all, it is used within political context. Why on Earth a scholar and an ademic feels the need to confuse his readers so much as to ntion a political term when he talks about religion Whatever Christianity has been or has not been or may have been, it is certainly sothing unrelated to modern political terms; even more so if these terms are recently invented as result of scheming and propaganda and therefore fully rejected by vast populations worldwide. However, the use of brutal manners in order to hieve power that will later consolidate the survival and the propagation of a faith, a religion, a sect or a secret order-organization is widely attested in almost every religion, culture, nation and period. There are many historical examples in this regard. The Ismailiyah Order of the Shia Muslims, who were also called Haain (because their leader Authentic Keith Rivers Jersey , the famous 'Elder of the Mountain' administered the proper dose of hai to his disciples in order to duly instruntalize and effectively utilize them for his purposes) and were known to Marco Polo (he called them Assassins and this is how this word was first used in European languages), used to send mbers (their secret knights) to cross incredibly long distances to arrive where their target (a ruler, an military leader, an imam or other) lived and, by treherously approhing, assassinate them. Should we call them 'terrorists' This would be utterly ridiculous. It is tually always pathetic and ludicrous to project one period's civilization's culture's asures, values and criteria onto other periods, civilizations and cultures. One cannot evaluate others through use of one's own criteria; every civilization, culture, religion, and historical period is an independent entity tWhen yo.
|
| Beitrag vom 29.01.2016 - 06:39 |
|
| Beiträge
| Autor
| Datum
|
|
| xiaoming |
29.01.2016 - 06:39 |
|
|
